Everybody expects that when they
purchase an instrument they should look great, but how do they do
that?
Years ago, custom finishes were never
heard of. Like Ford Motor Company President Henry Ford was quoted,
“people can order cars in any color they would like, as long as
it's black”.
Guitars were much like that. Not much
choice in color or finishes.
Today things are much different. Not
only because of desire by folks purchasing these instruments, but
also because there were, and still are some brilliant minds
experimenting with, and implementing their findings into mass
manufacture.
Even straight laced, unwavering
companies like Gibson have begun using new ideas for guitar finishes
and wood combinations. Yes, you can still purchase a 'Black Beauty'
that is pretty well the same guitar as it was since it's original
inception, but though it looks the same, the finish is very
different. I personally believe better than the original. Why?
Well, like so many other companies,
Gibson has found when you combine what already was working with what
is cutting edge technology, you tend to get something truly
remarkable.
The old Gibson guitars were famous for
crazing, especially in the back of the instrument. Though that sounds
like a bad thing, it really wasn't. It really made the guitar more
desirable. The new ones won't do that, only because technology has
changed.
Fender, on the other hand, featured
finishes that were straight up paint and lacquer. Fender colors in
the 50's and 60's were pretty provocative for the times. Their
guitars were the standard sunburst and the vintage and polar white,
but they also featured a powder blue, surf green, candy apple red and
a tri-color sunburst. Though their instruments were straight up
lacquer, Fender finishes, like Gibson, only tended to look better as
they aged. The antique white guitars that were painted in the 50's,
are a beautiful honey hue now. Like they have been in
smoke filled bars for years, when really, it's just normal fading of
the paint. Again, something very desirable for collectors today.
Still, what Fender was using was the
same basic paint an auto body shop would use to paint a car with.
They didn't use a clear coat, so the paint would 'off gas' and
eventually lighten in color and it's overall look.
Today, with the advent of
nitro-cellulose, epoxy based finishes and improved lacquers, guitars
can be painted in a multitude of colors and clear coats, and these
finishes will outlast original finishes as they are unlikely to fade,
craze, check or crack. Your Gibson 'Black Beauty', if purchased
today, will probably look the same in 50 years from now, if
maintained and looked after.
A new finish used by companies like
Paul Reed Smith, Carvin and more recently, even Gibson, doesn't
require painting the guitar at all.
What these folks are doing is 'dyeing'
or lightly staining the finish of woods like maple, swamp ash, alder,
koa, and a myriad of others. What this does is colors the wood, but
also allows the beauty of the wood's grain to show through. They
might do a straight up color, or a 'fade' finish, where the color
goes from lighter in the center of the instrument, to darker on the
outer edges of the instrument. This allows the builders to cover the
fact the 'face' wood laminate of the instrument. The body might be
mahogany, but the top is spalted maple. However, when blended
properly, one would find it very hard to see where one wood is melded
into the other. After this finish is applied to the instrument, it is
clear coated, either by using an incredibly hard finish like
nitro-cellulose, which dries very clear, almost 'water like' finish,
or a straight up lacquer, which has been improved by technological
advancements in quality, and ease of application. Other components,
like ultra violet protection and blending with differing polymers,
makes this a relatively hard finish as well.
Personally I have used something similar to PRS on my own
guitars. Two of them are hand stained using a blue stain on a swamp ash
back and flamed maple top and on another model I used a red sunburst
finish, and on the third a straight up sunburst on swamp ash. All three
of these are nitro cellulose clear coated. On my walnut bodies that I
received from my friend Keith Brommerich in California, I used 7 hand
applied coats of tung oil, and on the other walnut body, two coats of
hand applied polyurethane. Both of the walnut grains came alive with
these finishes. Now these finishes are not as tough as the nitro
cellulose models, but with an all natural, solid wood guitar, I believe
it's more important to show the beauty and richness of the wood and it's
grain. Had they been coated with a high gloss finish, I don't
personally believe I would have achieved the look that I was looking for
here.
If you are considering refinishing your
instrument, there are so many options these days. One only has to go
to the internet to see the options and finishes that are available.
Keep in mind though, unless you have the proper tools, and you have a
facility where you can do the 'prep' work, you might want to leave
this to a professional. Also, keep in mind as well, that anytime you
are sanding, priming, painting or clear coating an instrument, always
use proper safety equipment. Use a proper OSHA mask, or a respirator.
And always use safety glasses. Your health and safety is worth more
than any guitar on the planet. Don't take short cuts.
Please be prepared to read, in depth
instruction manuals on the subject of guitar finishing, or
refinishing.
I personally recommend Guitar
Finishing Step-By-Step (first and second editions) available
from Stewart MacDonald, by Don MacRostie and Dan
Erlewine
Don and Dan are probably the most
experienced luthiers in the industry. They both have a wealth of
knowledge, not just in guitar finishes, but everything you need to
know about building and repairing instruments.
Though I barely scratched the surface
on guitar finishes, I hope this gives you a better understanding of
just what finish might be on your guitar, and why.
Thank you for reading!
Brett McNaueal
Guitar technician and Luthier, Brett McNaueal shares ideas and tidbits about Guitar building, caring and maintaining Stringed instruments. If you have questions, please feel free to join in the conversations.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Ask the Guitar Guy: ACOUSTIC Pick Ups...What you really need to know.
Ask the Guitar Guy: ACOUSTIC Pick Ups...What you really need to know.: Today we are going to talk about acoustic guitar pickups, what's good, and maybe not so great. Years ago, when people like Les Paul a...
ACOUSTIC Pick Ups...What you really need to know.
Today we are going to talk about
acoustic guitar pickups, what's good, and maybe not so great.
Years ago, when people like Les Paul and Leo Fender and DeArmond first started to develop different types of pickups for their own guitars and for the companies they were representing, it was common practice to install a magnetic pickup into either the sound hole on an acoustic, or like John Lennon's J-160 and J-45 Gibson guitar, permanently fixed up against the fretboard at the sound hole.
These seemed to work okay for that period of time, but the problem was that a magnetic pickup only picked up the sound of the string and amplified that. It gave the guitar a more 'electric' sound than what it should sound like acoustically.
Barcus Berry was the first company to realize that an acoustic instrument should be amplified to sound like it does acoustically. So they invented the Barcus Berry 'transducer' pickup. What was different about this pickup was that it didn't amplify just the string sound, but also the vibration of the sound board, and that gave the instrument a more 'real' sound than it's earlier counterpart.
Now this pickup was widely used in the industry for live performance on upright basses, violins, mandolins, resonators and banjos.
The Barcus Berry,although it was a great answer for these other instruments, was not a favourite of guitar players. Why? Well, among other issues, the biggest issue was feedback.
In order to get the acoustic up to speed with the volume of the other instruments, the pickup would howl, and cause strings on the acoustic to vibrate, even when you weren't playing them.
The other reasons these guys never became a popular choice for acoustic players was that, in order to get the instrument to sound half decent, one would have to mount the pickup close to the bridge. It was always in the way of players, and when it was mounted internally, well, that is where a lot of those sensitivity issues would arise.
Also the cord they gave you with the pickup was never really long enough to get you to any amplifier, and it always dangled from the guitar. So this became just some of the reasons they never caught on for acoustic players.
Most acoustic artists just decided to go back to the microphone, and would try to get it as close to the instrument as they could, so that their instruments could be heard along with the others in the band.
Innovation continued for quite a few years, until the Japanese designed a pick up that would work, and would do that, rather trouble free.
What was this new-found gem? The piezo pickup.
Piezo is basically an electrical charge that accumulates in certain solid materials. It really wasn't something new, it was originally designed by two French physicists in the latter part of the 19th century.
What makes the piezo pickup better than their electromagnetic cousins is that they pickup, not just the string's sound, but also it's vibration. So, on an acoustic guitar, they emulate through an amplifier, what is audibly a sound that is very close to what the human ear hears acoustically.
Now, some companies use these exclusively on their acoustics. Some choose to use these, along with a live internal microphone to blend the sound that goes to the amplifier.
Both have their benefits and their short-comings.
There are also different ways you can mount this pickup to your guitar. Under the saddle, under the bridge plate, or a combination of both of these, as well as a combination of fixed places on the underside of the sound board.
All of this would not be possible without the use of an on board pre-amplifier, that buffers the signal between the guitar and the amplifier. This small pre-amp features basic tone and volume controls, as well as anti feedback and notch-filtering, graphic equalization and much more.
These usually operate on a 9 volt battery that is attached somewhere on the guitar. Though they basically operate on m/v (mini volts) the voltage and current this larger battery provides this pre-amplifier will work for extended periods, trouble free.
Companies like Takamine, (who by the way developed this technology) chose to mount their electronics on their guitars initially on the sidewall of the instrument. This usually meant there was this large device mounted on the sidewall of the instrument, which really didn't ever look that appealing. Newer design has electronics mounted so that you would not even know the guitar was an electric / acoustic instrument. Non-obtrusive and rather attractive. These are the kind I like to see installed.
Who make the best, and what should you stay away from.
There are many now to choose from. If you are looking at electrifying your acoustic, here are a few of my favourites, and why.
#1 – L.R. Baggs - (Anthem, Element or I-Beam)
James Taylor uses this system. Need I say more?
L.R. Baggs are a relatively easy install, even for the rank amateur. They are what I feel to be the best in the industry today. Companies like Larivee, Olsen, Boucher and Martin would probably agree, as this is what they use exclusively on their instruments.
#2 – MiSi – (Align, Cutless)
I am a big fan of these pickups. They are not unlike a lot of others as far as their install goes, but these pickups feature 'battery less' technology. You basically never have to change the battery in these units.
MiSi utilizes a stored capacitor, which is charged by means of a stereo cable / charge transformer. You simply charge the guitar through the end pin adapter for about two minutes, and you can play your guitar, without a re-charge for several hours. MiSi pickup technology is state of the art.
#3 – K&K – (Definity System)
Nice product. Relatively easy install. Will work on most acoustic instruments. An incredible true tone experience!!
#4 – Fishman – (Expression, Matrix, AG Series, Ellipse, Prefix, others)
Fishman is a good product as well, andthey have been at this for many years. In fact, the original Takamine technology was developed by Fishman. They are probably the best marketed, and widely known transducer pickup on the planet today. That being said, this doesn't make them the best.
I believe their 'Expression' system is one of the best in the industry today. This system is used on the higher end Taylor guitars. It is a beautiful, well designed system for acoustic instruments. However, this is where they fall short. The other items in their catalog do not measure up to their Expression system. I believe Fishman falls short in tone and reproducing the ultimate acoustic tone that L.R Baggs seems to be able to do, without having to break the bank. Another reason why the old adage 'bigger isn't always better' should be thought about here.
Fishman needs to start playing 'catch up' with some of these other companies, or they will just fade away into obscurity.
Remember, Seymour Duncan, DiMarzio, EMG, Lindy Fralin, TV Jones, and so many others wouldn't be around today if Gibson and Fender were still making good pickups.
Hope this helps in your search for that 'true' acoustic sound.
I have shared my own personal favourites here in this blog. I don't usually do this, but in this case I really couldn't get to important stuff, without naming names.
All that being said, when an acoustic is recorded in the studio today, it is still recorded by use of a live microphone. Why? Regardless of technology, there is nothing that can duplicate the true sound of an acoustic guitar like a live microphone can.
Cheers for now!
Brett McNaueal
Years ago, when people like Les Paul and Leo Fender and DeArmond first started to develop different types of pickups for their own guitars and for the companies they were representing, it was common practice to install a magnetic pickup into either the sound hole on an acoustic, or like John Lennon's J-160 and J-45 Gibson guitar, permanently fixed up against the fretboard at the sound hole.
These seemed to work okay for that period of time, but the problem was that a magnetic pickup only picked up the sound of the string and amplified that. It gave the guitar a more 'electric' sound than what it should sound like acoustically.
Barcus Berry was the first company to realize that an acoustic instrument should be amplified to sound like it does acoustically. So they invented the Barcus Berry 'transducer' pickup. What was different about this pickup was that it didn't amplify just the string sound, but also the vibration of the sound board, and that gave the instrument a more 'real' sound than it's earlier counterpart.
Now this pickup was widely used in the industry for live performance on upright basses, violins, mandolins, resonators and banjos.
The Barcus Berry,although it was a great answer for these other instruments, was not a favourite of guitar players. Why? Well, among other issues, the biggest issue was feedback.
In order to get the acoustic up to speed with the volume of the other instruments, the pickup would howl, and cause strings on the acoustic to vibrate, even when you weren't playing them.
The other reasons these guys never became a popular choice for acoustic players was that, in order to get the instrument to sound half decent, one would have to mount the pickup close to the bridge. It was always in the way of players, and when it was mounted internally, well, that is where a lot of those sensitivity issues would arise.
Also the cord they gave you with the pickup was never really long enough to get you to any amplifier, and it always dangled from the guitar. So this became just some of the reasons they never caught on for acoustic players.
Most acoustic artists just decided to go back to the microphone, and would try to get it as close to the instrument as they could, so that their instruments could be heard along with the others in the band.
Innovation continued for quite a few years, until the Japanese designed a pick up that would work, and would do that, rather trouble free.
What was this new-found gem? The piezo pickup.
Piezo is basically an electrical charge that accumulates in certain solid materials. It really wasn't something new, it was originally designed by two French physicists in the latter part of the 19th century.
What makes the piezo pickup better than their electromagnetic cousins is that they pickup, not just the string's sound, but also it's vibration. So, on an acoustic guitar, they emulate through an amplifier, what is audibly a sound that is very close to what the human ear hears acoustically.
Now, some companies use these exclusively on their acoustics. Some choose to use these, along with a live internal microphone to blend the sound that goes to the amplifier.
Both have their benefits and their short-comings.
There are also different ways you can mount this pickup to your guitar. Under the saddle, under the bridge plate, or a combination of both of these, as well as a combination of fixed places on the underside of the sound board.
All of this would not be possible without the use of an on board pre-amplifier, that buffers the signal between the guitar and the amplifier. This small pre-amp features basic tone and volume controls, as well as anti feedback and notch-filtering, graphic equalization and much more.
These usually operate on a 9 volt battery that is attached somewhere on the guitar. Though they basically operate on m/v (mini volts) the voltage and current this larger battery provides this pre-amplifier will work for extended periods, trouble free.
Companies like Takamine, (who by the way developed this technology) chose to mount their electronics on their guitars initially on the sidewall of the instrument. This usually meant there was this large device mounted on the sidewall of the instrument, which really didn't ever look that appealing. Newer design has electronics mounted so that you would not even know the guitar was an electric / acoustic instrument. Non-obtrusive and rather attractive. These are the kind I like to see installed.
Who make the best, and what should you stay away from.
There are many now to choose from. If you are looking at electrifying your acoustic, here are a few of my favourites, and why.
#1 – L.R. Baggs - (Anthem, Element or I-Beam)
James Taylor uses this system. Need I say more?
L.R. Baggs are a relatively easy install, even for the rank amateur. They are what I feel to be the best in the industry today. Companies like Larivee, Olsen, Boucher and Martin would probably agree, as this is what they use exclusively on their instruments.
#2 – MiSi – (Align, Cutless)
I am a big fan of these pickups. They are not unlike a lot of others as far as their install goes, but these pickups feature 'battery less' technology. You basically never have to change the battery in these units.
MiSi utilizes a stored capacitor, which is charged by means of a stereo cable / charge transformer. You simply charge the guitar through the end pin adapter for about two minutes, and you can play your guitar, without a re-charge for several hours. MiSi pickup technology is state of the art.
#3 – K&K – (Definity System)
Nice product. Relatively easy install. Will work on most acoustic instruments. An incredible true tone experience!!
#4 – Fishman – (Expression, Matrix, AG Series, Ellipse, Prefix, others)
Fishman is a good product as well, andthey have been at this for many years. In fact, the original Takamine technology was developed by Fishman. They are probably the best marketed, and widely known transducer pickup on the planet today. That being said, this doesn't make them the best.
I believe their 'Expression' system is one of the best in the industry today. This system is used on the higher end Taylor guitars. It is a beautiful, well designed system for acoustic instruments. However, this is where they fall short. The other items in their catalog do not measure up to their Expression system. I believe Fishman falls short in tone and reproducing the ultimate acoustic tone that L.R Baggs seems to be able to do, without having to break the bank. Another reason why the old adage 'bigger isn't always better' should be thought about here.
Fishman needs to start playing 'catch up' with some of these other companies, or they will just fade away into obscurity.
Remember, Seymour Duncan, DiMarzio, EMG, Lindy Fralin, TV Jones, and so many others wouldn't be around today if Gibson and Fender were still making good pickups.
Hope this helps in your search for that 'true' acoustic sound.
I have shared my own personal favourites here in this blog. I don't usually do this, but in this case I really couldn't get to important stuff, without naming names.
All that being said, when an acoustic is recorded in the studio today, it is still recorded by use of a live microphone. Why? Regardless of technology, there is nothing that can duplicate the true sound of an acoustic guitar like a live microphone can.
Cheers for now!
Brett McNaueal
Monday, September 30, 2013
Ask the Guitar Guy: About Intonation
Ask the Guitar Guy: About Intonation: Intonation....if you are a guitar player, you've probably heard that word many times. What exactly is intonation, and how does it affect...
About Intonation
Intonation....if you are a guitar player, you've probably heard that word many times. What exactly is intonation, and how does it affect the performance of the instruments.
Funny, I used to listen to the Beatles tracks on vinyl, and wondered why everything sounded like it was maybe not quite in tune, and then, in another passage of the song all was okay, and that resonate 'warbling' seemed to go away.
Well, what was wrong back then was their instruments, though they were some of the best for that time, were not properly intonated. In fact, Paul McCartney's bass guitar was almost impossible to intonate. It was a Hofner, and it was prior to Hofner's introduction of a truss rod. Being a short scaled instrument, as he played up scale (anything past the seventh fret) the guitar progressively became out of tune. I'll explain why in a bit, but suffice it to say there was not a lot the Beatles could do back then to make things better.
Since then, with the advent of digital remastering, they were able to take existing tracks and specifically correct the tuning of Paul's guitar, one note, and one song at a time. One of the big reasons digital remastering has caused some conflict with the original recordings.
Anyway, enough about that.
What is intonation? Basically it is re-defining the fretboard on any instrument to provide consistency in pitch as the guitar is played up scale.
A guitar neck is made up of a series of equations, and all have to coincide in order for it to work correctly. There is the scale of the neck, that is basically the distance from the inside of the nut, to the centre of each of the saddles on the bridge. Scale length can change depending on the instrument. For instance, a bass guitar can't be expected to have the same scale as a six string. And a dual octave, or twenty four fret guitar has a different scale length than a 22 fret instrument. Still, regardless of either, the centre of the guitar is alway the half way point. The Twelfth fret.
Other equations that fit into the mix here are the fretboard radius, the amount of relief on the neck, the thickness of the frets, and even down to the type and size of the string used on the instrument.
Basically, in a nutshell, intonation, depending on what other equations we have discussed, is the exact distance between the nut and the twelfth fret, and the twelfth fret and the bridge saddle.
Once a guitar is set up with the proper gauge of strings, and is tuned to whatever tuning it is normally tuned to (and believe me, there are many) the very last thing that is checked, set, or reset, is the intonation.
How is this done?
Most guitars, Fender, Gibson, PRS, G&L, Ernie Ball, and others, all feature a bridge made up of adjustable saddles. Intonation is set at the twelfth fret. The string is played 'open', and then checked at the twelfth. If the pitch of the note is higher at the twelfth than the open string, the saddle must be adjusted to compensate for all of the other variables we spoke of earlier. If the note rings higher than the open note, the saddle must be adjusted toward the tailpiece. If lower, towards the neck.
One would almost think the opposite, but keep in mind you are not tuning the guitar, you are selecting a bridge saddle position that best centres the string for both scales, on either side of the twelfth fret, which is the exact centre of the fretboard.
Years ago, saddles were not adjustable. One could fine-tune the bridge on the guitar, simple by moving it around. They floated on the guitar, and could be moved back or forth, and even tilted in order to get the guitar close to pitch.
Might have worked for the day, but that was really a poor approach to intonation.
A string's thickness also affects the intonation on the instrument, so intonation should always be checked when strings are changed to a heavier, or lighter gauge.
Changing the gauge of the strings also affects the relief on the neck. Relief also affects intonation.
Floyd Rose tremolos, are great for what they can do to change the sound of the instrument, but they are also a nightmare to set up, if you are not really familiar with them, and intonation on these can be a bit of a chore to set up.
What about acoustic guitars? Do they have to be intonated?
Of course they do. Acoustic intonation works much the same as their electric family members, the only thing different, is they usually feature 'fixed' intonation, by means of a compensated bridge / saddle. You might notice the bridge saddle slot on acoustics is milled out at a slight angle, never straight. This is the compensation for the intonation. Sometimes this is not enough to maintain the guitar's intonation and pitch, so the bridge saddle is further compensated on the bridge saddle. Have a close look if you own an acoustic, you might notice the saddle is stepped back, usually at the second string, to further compensate pitch.
A high end guitar might feature compensation on all of the individual strings.
It is important to remember which way the saddle goes into the slot when you remove and replace strings, because if it falls out and becomes reversed, your guitar is not going to sound right. Same applies for an electric archtop with a floating bridge. If the bridge comes loose as a result of string removal, you first want to maintain it's position as far as how it is facing the tailpiece, and exactly where it was situated on the guitar, to maintain intonation.
Always mark the position of the bridge on an archtop with a piece of black electrical tape. Simply align the tape with the position of the bridge prior to removing strings. Don't mark the guitar. After you reposition the bridge and install the strings, simply remove the tape. No mess, and no headaches.
Can you turn a right handed acoustic into a left handed acoustic guitar. Basically, no!
This simply will not work.
I have seen where the fella at the music store down the street, in order to make a sale, switched the nut on a right handed acoustic to a left handed nut. I would say he might have made up a new nut, but he wasn't that bright. He then went on to string the guitar upside down. This doesn't work.
Why?
Intonation! Plain and simple. The compensation on the saddle will be facing in the wrong direction, so as a person plays the guitar upscale, it continues to go out of tune.
Don't do this. It's not cool. If you need a lefty, buy a lefty. They make them everyday.
Regardless of the stringed instrument, intonation is a requirement.
Now, let's get back to Paul McCartney's bass.
Why was it sounding out of tune as he played the higher notes? He played a Hofner bass.
Back in the day Hofner never built a bass with a truss rod. Not even a steel re-enforced neck. So when Sir Paul used to tune his bass to A-440 hz, or piano pitch, the neck used to bow up on relief. This changed the respective position between the nut and the twelfth fret. The problem couldn't be rectified by adjusting the floating bridge on the Hofner 500/1, because the problem was between the nut and the twelfth fret, not the 12th fret and the bridge. So it would have been very difficult to eliminate in the day. Hofner has since corrected that problem, and installed a truss rod in their necks. Huge improvement.
Still, if Paul would have just used a Fender Precision back then, in all likelihood, that would never have happened. Thanks for digital mastering. The old recordings used to make me cringe.
So that is a bit about intonation. Maybe now you'll know what folks are talking about when they mention that word.
Till next time folks! Keep rockin'!!
Brett McNaueal
Funny, I used to listen to the Beatles tracks on vinyl, and wondered why everything sounded like it was maybe not quite in tune, and then, in another passage of the song all was okay, and that resonate 'warbling' seemed to go away.
Well, what was wrong back then was their instruments, though they were some of the best for that time, were not properly intonated. In fact, Paul McCartney's bass guitar was almost impossible to intonate. It was a Hofner, and it was prior to Hofner's introduction of a truss rod. Being a short scaled instrument, as he played up scale (anything past the seventh fret) the guitar progressively became out of tune. I'll explain why in a bit, but suffice it to say there was not a lot the Beatles could do back then to make things better.
Since then, with the advent of digital remastering, they were able to take existing tracks and specifically correct the tuning of Paul's guitar, one note, and one song at a time. One of the big reasons digital remastering has caused some conflict with the original recordings.
Anyway, enough about that.
What is intonation? Basically it is re-defining the fretboard on any instrument to provide consistency in pitch as the guitar is played up scale.
A guitar neck is made up of a series of equations, and all have to coincide in order for it to work correctly. There is the scale of the neck, that is basically the distance from the inside of the nut, to the centre of each of the saddles on the bridge. Scale length can change depending on the instrument. For instance, a bass guitar can't be expected to have the same scale as a six string. And a dual octave, or twenty four fret guitar has a different scale length than a 22 fret instrument. Still, regardless of either, the centre of the guitar is alway the half way point. The Twelfth fret.
Other equations that fit into the mix here are the fretboard radius, the amount of relief on the neck, the thickness of the frets, and even down to the type and size of the string used on the instrument.
Basically, in a nutshell, intonation, depending on what other equations we have discussed, is the exact distance between the nut and the twelfth fret, and the twelfth fret and the bridge saddle.
Once a guitar is set up with the proper gauge of strings, and is tuned to whatever tuning it is normally tuned to (and believe me, there are many) the very last thing that is checked, set, or reset, is the intonation.
How is this done?
Most guitars, Fender, Gibson, PRS, G&L, Ernie Ball, and others, all feature a bridge made up of adjustable saddles. Intonation is set at the twelfth fret. The string is played 'open', and then checked at the twelfth. If the pitch of the note is higher at the twelfth than the open string, the saddle must be adjusted to compensate for all of the other variables we spoke of earlier. If the note rings higher than the open note, the saddle must be adjusted toward the tailpiece. If lower, towards the neck.
One would almost think the opposite, but keep in mind you are not tuning the guitar, you are selecting a bridge saddle position that best centres the string for both scales, on either side of the twelfth fret, which is the exact centre of the fretboard.
Years ago, saddles were not adjustable. One could fine-tune the bridge on the guitar, simple by moving it around. They floated on the guitar, and could be moved back or forth, and even tilted in order to get the guitar close to pitch.
Might have worked for the day, but that was really a poor approach to intonation.
A string's thickness also affects the intonation on the instrument, so intonation should always be checked when strings are changed to a heavier, or lighter gauge.
Changing the gauge of the strings also affects the relief on the neck. Relief also affects intonation.
Floyd Rose tremolos, are great for what they can do to change the sound of the instrument, but they are also a nightmare to set up, if you are not really familiar with them, and intonation on these can be a bit of a chore to set up.
What about acoustic guitars? Do they have to be intonated?
Of course they do. Acoustic intonation works much the same as their electric family members, the only thing different, is they usually feature 'fixed' intonation, by means of a compensated bridge / saddle. You might notice the bridge saddle slot on acoustics is milled out at a slight angle, never straight. This is the compensation for the intonation. Sometimes this is not enough to maintain the guitar's intonation and pitch, so the bridge saddle is further compensated on the bridge saddle. Have a close look if you own an acoustic, you might notice the saddle is stepped back, usually at the second string, to further compensate pitch.
A high end guitar might feature compensation on all of the individual strings.
It is important to remember which way the saddle goes into the slot when you remove and replace strings, because if it falls out and becomes reversed, your guitar is not going to sound right. Same applies for an electric archtop with a floating bridge. If the bridge comes loose as a result of string removal, you first want to maintain it's position as far as how it is facing the tailpiece, and exactly where it was situated on the guitar, to maintain intonation.
Always mark the position of the bridge on an archtop with a piece of black electrical tape. Simply align the tape with the position of the bridge prior to removing strings. Don't mark the guitar. After you reposition the bridge and install the strings, simply remove the tape. No mess, and no headaches.
Can you turn a right handed acoustic into a left handed acoustic guitar. Basically, no!
This simply will not work.
I have seen where the fella at the music store down the street, in order to make a sale, switched the nut on a right handed acoustic to a left handed nut. I would say he might have made up a new nut, but he wasn't that bright. He then went on to string the guitar upside down. This doesn't work.
Why?
Intonation! Plain and simple. The compensation on the saddle will be facing in the wrong direction, so as a person plays the guitar upscale, it continues to go out of tune.
Don't do this. It's not cool. If you need a lefty, buy a lefty. They make them everyday.
Regardless of the stringed instrument, intonation is a requirement.
Now, let's get back to Paul McCartney's bass.
Why was it sounding out of tune as he played the higher notes? He played a Hofner bass.
Back in the day Hofner never built a bass with a truss rod. Not even a steel re-enforced neck. So when Sir Paul used to tune his bass to A-440 hz, or piano pitch, the neck used to bow up on relief. This changed the respective position between the nut and the twelfth fret. The problem couldn't be rectified by adjusting the floating bridge on the Hofner 500/1, because the problem was between the nut and the twelfth fret, not the 12th fret and the bridge. So it would have been very difficult to eliminate in the day. Hofner has since corrected that problem, and installed a truss rod in their necks. Huge improvement.
Still, if Paul would have just used a Fender Precision back then, in all likelihood, that would never have happened. Thanks for digital mastering. The old recordings used to make me cringe.
So that is a bit about intonation. Maybe now you'll know what folks are talking about when they mention that word.
Till next time folks! Keep rockin'!!
Brett McNaueal
Monday, September 16, 2013
Tonewoods Part Two
Last week we talked a bit about tone
woods, and what most guitar manufacturers use, and why they use that
specific type of wood. This week I would like to talk about the
'other' wood used on the acoustic guitar, that being the soundboard.
The soundboard on an acoustic
instrument is the top of the guitar, or the part of the instrument
you would rest your hand on to play.
Though they can differ from
manufacturer to manufacturer, the majority of the folks that build
them use spruce as a soundboard.
The reason for spruce? That word
'resonance' returns again at this juncture in our story. It's
how the wood vibrates and transfers sound to the sound box. Guitar
builders have tried many other woods over the years, like poplar,
maple, cypress, cedar, birch and many more as a sound board, but time
and again 'spruce' seems to be their first choice.
Spruce can be somewhat fragile so it is
usually the premium select grade that is used here. It can't have
knots or wavy grain or other anomalies. That would simply change the
tone.
A soundboard must be consistent in
grain and is usually book-matched with a similar piece to make up the
soundboard on an acoustic instrument. Book-matching means taking a
piece, usually hewn from the same part of the tree, and glueing both
pieces together, side by side. This makes the wood resonate better,
and cosmetically is more attractive on the instrument. Some builders
choose to laminate their soundboards using a combination of varying
pieces, and glueing these together, but those guitars are usually low
end, or guitars that are painted, so as the laminations aren't as
visible.
There are many different types of
spruce, but the choice of most builders usually comes down to three,
Sitka, Englemann, and Adirondack, with the majority of this wood
coming from Canada, the U.S. and Europe.
To get the proper 'timbre' (pardon the
pun...that is not timber) or resonant tone, these soundboards have to
be seasoned very gently, as drying of the wood too quickly will only
go on to cause cracking and other issues down the road.
Some guitar builders, and I will use
Martin again for an example, also take this a step further and reduce
the thickness of their soundboards in certain areas to create more
volume from the instrument and differing tones, depending on where
one would strum the instrument.
Nonetheless, I could go into great
detail on this subject, and still come up with the same common
denominator, and that is soundboards can vary in dimension and type
of wood used, but they all do basically the same thing, and that is
amplify the instrument through the sound box and back out the sound
hole, or 'F' holes if it is an archtop guitar.
Cedar can also be used as a soundboard
in guitar building. Though it is used mostly to build classical
instruments, it is also starting to be used more and more as a
soundboard by some popular steel string builders as well.
Cedar is a little more 'dull' in sound
in comparison to it's spruce cousins, but the right type and
thickness of cedar can feature similar tones to spruce. Cedar is a
very fragile, delicate wood, and must be conditioned with care before
being used as a soundboard. Some cedar is found in Canada and the
U.S., but the majority of the cedar used to build fine quality
instruments comes from European countries, and also from Norway,
Sweden and Finland.
Electric instruments are not as fragile
as their acoustic relatives, and the choices of woods for their make
up can be much the same as acoustics, and much different at the same
time.
Some electric builders, like Gibson,
PRS, Gretsch, and quite a few others, also tend to use mahogany for
the production of the necks and headstocks on their instruments, and
in some cases, the bodies as well. Some of these builders utilize a
'set' neck design, which shares a lot of the same characteristics as
the dovetail on the acoustics. The neck is set, or glued onto the
guitar in such a fashion that it marries the body in what looks like
a mortise and tenon joint. Kind of like over-lapping one onto
the other. The guitar is notched out to meet the neck extension, and
that is glued together directly below where the
neck pickup is mounted to the
instrument. The advantage of this is 'tone'. Massive tone!! And that
is started at the headstock, where the strings attach, transmitted
through the neck and fretboard and directly into the body of the
instrument. Disadvantages?? Well, if you ever have to remove the
neck, because it might have suffered a broken neck, or requires a
neck reset, you are pretty well out of luck here.
You would have to bring it to a
certified luthier to have the neck removed, repaired and replaced on
the instrument. Sometimes, it's just as easy to buy a new guitar, for
what the repair is going to cost.
Fender, on the other hand, doesn't do
it this way. The bulk of the guitars and basses Fender makes, all
feature a 'bolt on' neck, which really isn't bolted on at all. It is
screwed on to the body. So, I am not too sure where that term ever
came from. Some builders, like myself, prefer to bolt the neck onto
the body. That is achieved by installing threaded inserts into the
neck and instead of using wood screws, you would use machine screws,
or bolts. This adheres the neck better to the body, thusly improving
tone, and there is less chance of the neck moving if the headstock
gets bumped, or the guitar suffers a fall.
Fender's choice in woods did vary, but
only slightly. Fender is very traditional with what woods they use to
build their guitars.
Fender necks are usually always made up
of select rock maple, and their fretboards are usually, either
rosewood, or maple.
Fender bodies can be made up of a
multitude of different woods, but their stock instruments are usually
made up of either 'Alder” (American clear poplar) or Swamp Ash,
though Fender has also dabbled with other woods for their bodies,
like Koa, White Ash, Walnut, Rosewood, Cherry, Curly or Flamed Maple
and Mahogany.
I have built a few guitars of my own
recently, where the bodies were built for me by a friend of mine in
California at Matt's Woodworking. His name is Keith Brommerich. These
guitars were solid one piece walnut. They turned out beautiful.
Walnut has to have one of the prettiest grains I have ever seen, and
these guitars come to life with just a little light finishing on the
bodies. They also come to life when they are played, and sound unlike
anything I have ever heard before. Thank you Keith.
Fender, unlike Gibson and others, uses
single coil pick ups in their guitars. Some argue that regardless of
what wood is used on the guitar, by using single coils, one doesn't
change the tone, or sound of the guitar. Well, I really don't believe
that to be true. I believe that anytime any pickup is somehow
fastened to an instrument, the sound is changed by the type of wood
that the pickup is attached to. Ash sounds different than alder, and
Cherry sounds different than walnut.
Gibson, with their humbucking PAF
design pickups? Well, that is a whole new ball game.
Gibson knew what they were doing from
the get-go, by using the all mahogany body and the humbucking
pickups. That was just the sound that everybody was looking for at
the time. And the heavier the guitar, the better the tone. Though
wearing a 13 pound guitar all night is not what I would call
appealing at best, Gibson has sold some guitars, and continues to,
even to this day. The Les Paul or the SG hasn't really changed in
look a lot, but they have in sound. Why? Well some brilliant engineer
at Gibson decided to take what was already great and put his spin on
it, and came out with the natural series, the weight relieved and the
chambered series guitars. Guitars that look the same, but don't sound
the same. Mainly because they removed from the guitar what mattered
most. The wood. It is seldom at best you can get a solid wood
anything from Gibson. In trying to save the planet, it seems they
forgot about what matters most...the tone!! And what makes the tone?
A combination of things, with the wood being number one. Pure and
simple.
Though Fender has changed some of their
lineup of instruments, they haven't changed their basic guitar design
and principle. That of course being what Leo Fender started years ago
when he would hand select the neck and bodies himself for his
guitars. Don't mess with what works. Gibson needs to take a good
hard look at this, and go back to what they used to do. Again, don't
mess with what works.
That is also why you see companies like
PRS, Carvin,and MusicMan, building some great guitars. They are just simply
doing what companies like Gibson used to do, and are doing it a whole
lot better.
Their quality control is better and
more consistent and they make their guitars out of what matters
most....real wood.
That's all for this week. Have a good
one. See you next time.
Cheers!
Brett McNaueal
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
About Tone Woods
Hope everyone had a great week.
This week I would like to talk about
tone woods. What makes them different, and what you can expect in how
these woods perform
You might think, like a lot of folks,
that a guitar, acoustic or otherwise, is just simply made of wood,
and when you put strings and electronics on it, it makes music.
Well... it's something like that, but just a bit more involved.
There are a multitude of different tone
woods that are used in the manufacturing of acoustics, solid bodies,
arch-tops and basses.
Let's start with acoustic guitars.
The most widely used tone wood used in
building acoustic instruments is mahogany. Why? Well, it's
affordable. It is reliable, (doesn't twist and is a relatively tough
wood) it is an attractive wood, and it is easily finished. It also
lasts for years, and requires little to no maintenance. But, the
biggest reason for using mahogany is that is resonates so well.
Martin Guitars tend to use a lot more
of this wood, comparatively to other manufacturers such as Gibson,
Larivee, Breedlove and others.
Martin uses Mahogany on the backs and
sides of their guitars, as well as the neck and their head stocks.
Martin guitars have a distinctive sound
unlike any other guitar. Though other Luthiers and guitar
manufacturers have been trying for many years to find out how they
achieve the sound they do, even with the right equations and
engineering to duplicate the Martin 'sound', they have always come up
short. They are truly a remarkable instrument.
Though Martin, like so many other
builders, do not like to share their secrets, other builders, even in
coming close to duplicating the Martin sound, have in their own right
discovered their own unique sound.
The sound of the instrument is not 100%
dependant on just the tone woods alone. With Martin, and so many
others, it is the right combination of a lot of things.
Let's move on to other tone woods and
why they are used, and where they are used on the guitar.
Sticking with acoustic guitars for this
portion of this blog, Rosewood is probably the next best choice for
guitar builders. Rosewood comes in many varieties. Macassar, Indian,
African and the most popular, Brazilian. Rosewood is a very fragrant,
oily, and porous wood. Still, when it is seasoned properly, rosewood
can be as dense a ebony and duplicate a lot of similar
characteristics in tone, but at half the price. Again, this is one of
the reasons rosewood is a popular choice for use on acoustic, and
some electric instruments.
Where is it used? Rosewood is usually
used as fretboard material, headstock laminate and most importantly
on the back and sides of the instrument. As a soundbox choice, (the
back and sides of the acoustic guitar) rosewood is less aggressive
and more resonant than mahogany, it's cousin, but if used on
dreadnaughts and jumbo guitars, rosewood provides a very rich and
distinctive tone. Rosewood has been used for years by many
manufacturers as an alternative to mahogany and other tone woods.
Rosewood is also used in the manufacture of the bridge plate on the
guitar, as well as the sub plate, that is the plate affixed to the
guitar's bracing and is attached to the underside of the soundboard,
or 'top' of the instrument. Rosewood is also used as the inner
purfling on a lot of higher end instruments. Why? Simply because it
vibrates and resonates better.
The only problem with rosewood is that
it is a somewhat 'oily' wood, which makes it difficult to adhere to
the neck material, as well as the soundboard on acoustics. Great
caution has to be taken to make sure the wood is properly conditioned
and seasoned, or 'aged' as well as the use of correct adhesives for
the process.
As guitars mature, one will often see
where binding attached to rosewood has started to crack and craze and
eventually pull away from the instrument. Gretsch and Gibson, to name
a few, are re-knowned for these issues. Gibson also had problems with
their rosewood bridge plates lifting on their guitars, and eventually
moved on to a different wood for this purpose.
Ebony is next on the agenda.
Ebony is a very dark, black wood. It is
very dense and somewhat fragile with age, if not conditioned
properly.
Where is it used on the instrument?
Usually ebony is used as fretboard material, but can also be used as
a bridge plate, or a laminate with other woods for dressing a
headstock.
Ebony has an advantage over rosewood in
that it is extremely dense, less prone to wear and usually works well
in adherence to other woods like mahogany.
A huge advantage in using ebony as a
fretboard material, is that ebony does not wear out like some
rosewoods do. So there is never the concern to having 'divots' in
your fret beds.
These divots, or wearing out of the
fret beds (in between the frets) has always been a great concern to
manufacturers, because when this happens, there is usually little one
can do to repair this, but replace the fretboard, or in some cases,
even the entire neck on the instrument.
Now that is all the good stuff about
ebony. Surely there has to be some disadvantages right?
Well, to answer this...yes there is.
The biggest problem with ebony and its
choice for either a fretboard, or a bridge plate, or anything else on
the guitar, is simply that it is a very fragile wood. Ebony never
stops expanding and contracting as it takes on and expels moisture
and humidity. This is caused by the raising and lowering of the
humidity in the ambient air in the guitar's environment, and also
from the very moisture in your hands and fingers. Due to the constant
changing of this wood's conditioning, it is prone to crack, and it
can also cause problems with adhesion on either the neck, or contact
with the soundboard.
The largest problem with ebony is fret
removal. When used as a fretboard, ebony can become very stiff and
fragile, and when frets need to be removed and replaced, the fret
slots can gaul or shatter. Caution and care have to be used when
removing frets on an ebony fretboard, and this is usually done with
the use of heat, by means of an iron, and very slow and careful
removal of these frets. In many cases, when new frets are installed,
they usually have to be glued into the fret slots, and then clamped
individually so as proper adhesion can be assured.
Another disadvantage of ebony, is that
it is not always readily available, and it's cost far out weighs
rosewood.
Though there are definitely advantages
and dis-advantages to both, rosewood seems to be the favourite choice
by most makers for fret boards and bridge plates.
Next week we'll talk a bit about
soundboards, and what woods they are made up of, and we will touch on
some electric guitars as well, and what woods they are made up of.
Until then.....take care, and keep
playing.
Brett McNaueal
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Guitar electronics
Today I am going to talk a bit about
electronics. I can get into great detail on this subject, but I
really don't want to do that. There are varying opinions on the
subject of what pickups are better than others, what guitar company
wires their instruments the best, and on and on.
What I do want to talk about is what
makes a guitar an electric guitar. Where does the sound come from,
that you hear in your amplifier, and what makes that happen.
Basically, electric guitars and basses
operate on the same principle. They have pickups, controls, switches,
etc.
A pickup is a series of magnetic poles.
These poles could not effectively 'pickup' the sound from the strings
without a few important things. Number one is a fairly strong
magnet, that is attached to the poles, 6 and 12 for guitar, and 4, 5,
6 and more for basses.
Number two is a coil of insulated wire
with a start and finish end.
The insulated coil wire is wrapped
around the magnetic poles, and the amount of wraps vary from one
manufacturer to another.
There is an elite group of pickup
manufacturers in todays market, and depending on what sound you are
looking for, they will custom design a pickup that is just right for
the sound you want to hear from your guitar.
That, in a nutshell is what makes the
sound. Again, I am not getting into detail in this blog.
So, what happens from the pickup? How
does that sound get to my amplifier?
The pickups convert the sound that the
strings make on the guitar to an electronic signal. Based on how many
pickups you have on an instrument, this is usually routed through a
switch. The switch basically sends the signal from one, two, or three
pickup guitars to a volume / tone potentiometer, or 'pot'. The
potentiometer varies the amount of signal that you would want to go
to your amplifier on to the guitar's output jack. So when you plug
your guitar into your amplifier, you can control the volume both on
your guitar and your amplifier.
Potentiometers are also referred to as
'faders', because that is what they do. There are also tone, or
treble / bass potentiometers on your guitar. These vary the bass /
treble, or 'tone' on your instrument through a small capacitor. On
some guitars, there are either one, or two tone controls, and the
same is true of the volume controls.
By raising and lowering the pickup,
either closer to, or further away from your strings, one can add a
lot of colour and tone to your 'sound'. There are factory specs for
Fender, Ibanez, Gibson, PRS and many more. But ultimately you are the
one that has to decide what sound your are looking for from your
instrument.
Some pickups require an 'active'
circuit, by means of a small on-board pre-amplifier. These Pre-amps
are usually powered by the use of a 9 volt battery, which, like the
pre-amp, is installed in the control cavity of the guitar.
Acoustic guitars can also be amplified
by use of a pickup. Newer acoustics utilize 'piezo' technology. A
'piezo' is a tiny pickup that is designed to pickup vibration and
resonance, as opposed to a magnetic signal.
Some of the new manufacturers of
acoustic pickups have gotten incredibly good at making an acoustic
sound amazingly like it should sound 'acoustically' by means of the
use of these pickups.
The piezo pickup is also operated on
battery technology, or 'phantom' power. Which, in simple terms is
power that comes back into the instrument from an external device,
like a DC power supply, sound board, or a digital interface.
The Gibson guitar company features a
PAF (patent applied for) pickup on their guitars. These are also
called humbucking, or balanced pickups. They are basically two single
coil pickups that utilize two different magnets. The magnets are
mounted in such a fashion that their respective poles attract
(North-South and South-North) On the 6 string models, they feature 12
individual poles and on most PAF's one set of poles is covered by the
chrome pickup cover. It is debatable as to whether or not the pickup
cover is really required on these, and on some models it is
dis-attached from the pickup.
Fender pickups, for the majority, have
always been single coil. That just works for them. Like Gibson, and
so many others, Fender has always maintained an 'if it ain't
broke....' approach to their guitars. They may have changed their
guitar designs and colours a bit, but their basic pickups are still
the same.
Bass guitar pickups are built much the
same as their electric 'cousins' but are usually overwound to better
re-produce the lower frequencies of those bass notes. Basses also
utilize both the humbucker, single coil and active designed pickups,
but most of the bass guys I know prefer the simple old single coils,
or active single coils. The Fender Precision Bass is still one of the
biggest selling basses on the planet, and they are pretty much the
same guitar they were when they were introduced in the 50's.
It's just that pickup technology has
gotten so much better than the old ceramic or 'rare earth' magnets.
Newer designed magnets (Alnico 3&5)
will outlast their counterparts, because the magnetism will not fade
like it did on the old pickups, and as a result, neither will the
tone.
Some guitar manufacturers use both
humbuckers and single coil pickups on their guitars. This combination
of pickups gives the player a wide range of sound. Not just volume,
but different 'tonal' characteristics as well. Different pickups can
totally change the sound of your guitar, and they can be an exact
retrofit for your guitar. In other words, nobody will ever know but
you.
I have my favourites, but again, that
is not what this blog is about.
Hopefully this has given you a better
insight as to how electric guitars work.
Have fun!
Brett McNaueal
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Machine heads.
Machine heads. No, we are not talking about a Deep Purple album, but possibly the most important item on your guitar or bass.
What is a machine head? Well, some folks just call them tuners, tuning machines, string tensioners, winders...and a whole lot more. Proper terminology.....machine heads.
Why? Well, that is because that is exactly what they are, and what their sole purpose is on the instrument.
The machine head is usually made up of two gears that mesh together and drive the shaft that the string is attached to. One gear is a worm style and the other is a helically machined spur gear. The tuner button shaft, or 'input' shaft drives the worm that in turn drives the spur gear.
The tuner button is usually driven onto a splined shaft to avoid slippage, and keep the machine positive at all times.
Years ago, the machine head consisted of what is similarly used on violins to this day. The tuners were hand cut dowels, that were tapered and usually made up of a very hard wood such as ebony. These were installed into tapered holes, and the string was fed into this tuner by means of a slotted peg head, again, quite similar to todays classical (nylon string) guitars and violins. One would simply turn the tuner until the string had reached the desired pitch, then they were pushed into the taper to lock the string in tune.
This didn't serve to work too well with the guitar, because as string designs changed, it became more difficult to both tune the string and maintain that it would stay in tune.
Hence the machine head. Based on the old 'leverage' principal, turning the tuner shaft against the spur gear proved to be less of an effort, they maintained (well...sort of maintained) their tuning, and did it with a lot less effort.
When I mentioned they 'sort of' maintained their tuning, well, let's just say they have come a long way since back in the day. String tensions were greater back then than what they are now, due to the fact most of the strings were bronze wound steel core strings. And the core wires were huge in comparison to what they are now. So, a lot of times the guitar machine would slip back on the tension that was applied to it. One would literally watch the guitar tuner turn backwards while they were playing. And this didn't just happen to the old Silvertone's, Kay's and Harmony guitars, but also to the Gretsch's, Gibson's and Martin's as well.
How did they get around that? Simply by 'building a better mousetrap', or so to speak.
They had to redesign the early machines from their original gearing that was a 4:1 ratio, and increased that to an 8:1 gear ratio. They also cut the teeth on the spur gear on a slight angle, opposite to it's direction of travel. This helped in reducing slippage and back-lash on the gears.
Though standard machine head gearing has increased again to a 16:1 ratio, other improvements such as pilot shaft clutches help to reduce string slippage and increase tuning accuracy.
What is the best tuning machine out there today? Well, that depends on what you are looking for. One might want accuracy and not care about style and looks, while another might want the whole package.
There are many to choose from, such as Grover, Kluson, Sperzel, Schaller, Waverly, Gotoh, and so many more. There are also some really good machines that won't break the bank, like Profile and Planet Waves, and some companies even make their own machines, Fender and PRS to name a few.
My personal favourite is the Schaller machine for electric guitars and basses, and I would have to say Gotoh for acoustic guitars. Why? Well simply because, like so many other things that are made in Germany, they seem to out perform most, if not all of the others in some way. Schaller's 2030 Locking Machine is by far, one of the best on the market today, and with the inclusion of their new 18:1 series, you will have to go a long way to find a better machine. These are a little expensive, and can be harder to find than most, but they are worth the extra dollars.
Gotoh is a Japanese product, and for acoustics, and some electrics, such as the Strat and Tele, these machines are hard to beat. They are reasonably priced and will last for years. Like the German's, the Japanese also know how to build a very competitive product.
Now some of you like to look into modifying your instruments, and that usually starts with the electronics and bridge components.
Personally, I say do yourself a favour and start with the machine heads. Get yourself a set that will fit your guitar's original design. You should never have to re-drill holes or add screws. Your new set of machines should be completely interchangeable with the original set. Don't modify your guitar to fit the machine heads. You will only de-value your instrument and you can really mess things up if you are not sure of what you are doing.
If you are not sure of what to do, seek out someone in your area that is knowledgeable about this, and together I am sure you can weigh out your options.
I didn't talk specifically about guitars equipped with the Floyd Rose tuning system, and there is reasoning in that. The reason being, that will be something to talk about next time.
So, until then....stay tuned!!
Cheers!
Brett McNaueal
What is a machine head? Well, some folks just call them tuners, tuning machines, string tensioners, winders...and a whole lot more. Proper terminology.....machine heads.
Why? Well, that is because that is exactly what they are, and what their sole purpose is on the instrument.
The machine head is usually made up of two gears that mesh together and drive the shaft that the string is attached to. One gear is a worm style and the other is a helically machined spur gear. The tuner button shaft, or 'input' shaft drives the worm that in turn drives the spur gear.
The tuner button is usually driven onto a splined shaft to avoid slippage, and keep the machine positive at all times.
Years ago, the machine head consisted of what is similarly used on violins to this day. The tuners were hand cut dowels, that were tapered and usually made up of a very hard wood such as ebony. These were installed into tapered holes, and the string was fed into this tuner by means of a slotted peg head, again, quite similar to todays classical (nylon string) guitars and violins. One would simply turn the tuner until the string had reached the desired pitch, then they were pushed into the taper to lock the string in tune.
This didn't serve to work too well with the guitar, because as string designs changed, it became more difficult to both tune the string and maintain that it would stay in tune.
Hence the machine head. Based on the old 'leverage' principal, turning the tuner shaft against the spur gear proved to be less of an effort, they maintained (well...sort of maintained) their tuning, and did it with a lot less effort.
When I mentioned they 'sort of' maintained their tuning, well, let's just say they have come a long way since back in the day. String tensions were greater back then than what they are now, due to the fact most of the strings were bronze wound steel core strings. And the core wires were huge in comparison to what they are now. So, a lot of times the guitar machine would slip back on the tension that was applied to it. One would literally watch the guitar tuner turn backwards while they were playing. And this didn't just happen to the old Silvertone's, Kay's and Harmony guitars, but also to the Gretsch's, Gibson's and Martin's as well.
How did they get around that? Simply by 'building a better mousetrap', or so to speak.
They had to redesign the early machines from their original gearing that was a 4:1 ratio, and increased that to an 8:1 gear ratio. They also cut the teeth on the spur gear on a slight angle, opposite to it's direction of travel. This helped in reducing slippage and back-lash on the gears.
Though standard machine head gearing has increased again to a 16:1 ratio, other improvements such as pilot shaft clutches help to reduce string slippage and increase tuning accuracy.
What is the best tuning machine out there today? Well, that depends on what you are looking for. One might want accuracy and not care about style and looks, while another might want the whole package.
There are many to choose from, such as Grover, Kluson, Sperzel, Schaller, Waverly, Gotoh, and so many more. There are also some really good machines that won't break the bank, like Profile and Planet Waves, and some companies even make their own machines, Fender and PRS to name a few.
My personal favourite is the Schaller machine for electric guitars and basses, and I would have to say Gotoh for acoustic guitars. Why? Well simply because, like so many other things that are made in Germany, they seem to out perform most, if not all of the others in some way. Schaller's 2030 Locking Machine is by far, one of the best on the market today, and with the inclusion of their new 18:1 series, you will have to go a long way to find a better machine. These are a little expensive, and can be harder to find than most, but they are worth the extra dollars.
Gotoh is a Japanese product, and for acoustics, and some electrics, such as the Strat and Tele, these machines are hard to beat. They are reasonably priced and will last for years. Like the German's, the Japanese also know how to build a very competitive product.
Now some of you like to look into modifying your instruments, and that usually starts with the electronics and bridge components.
Personally, I say do yourself a favour and start with the machine heads. Get yourself a set that will fit your guitar's original design. You should never have to re-drill holes or add screws. Your new set of machines should be completely interchangeable with the original set. Don't modify your guitar to fit the machine heads. You will only de-value your instrument and you can really mess things up if you are not sure of what you are doing.
If you are not sure of what to do, seek out someone in your area that is knowledgeable about this, and together I am sure you can weigh out your options.
I didn't talk specifically about guitars equipped with the Floyd Rose tuning system, and there is reasoning in that. The reason being, that will be something to talk about next time.
So, until then....stay tuned!!
Cheers!
Brett McNaueal
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Proper string height (action)
A lot of folks ask me what the proper string height should be on an acoustic guitar, and on an electric guitar. I even get asked periodically what the proper string height should be on a bass guitar.
String height is also referred to as 'action' on a guitar.
The answer to this is....'it depends!!'
An optimum string height for an acoustic guitar should be about 1/8" at the 12th fret. For an electric, about 3/32" at the 12th fret.
Proper string height depends on a lot of things, and this is the way I look at it.
The first thing you want to check is, has there been any work done to the instrument recently, frets repaired, levelled or dressed and polished. Believe it or not, this can make a huge difference in the performance and action on your instrument.
I have had guitars come to me, both electric and acoustic that have had a few frets replaced. These are usually the first three or four frets closest to the nut. I have seen some major league 'hack jobs' where the fret wire is not even close to then original size. As a result, the string height had to be raised so the strings would clear the new frets. This made the instrument virtually unplayable, and was usually a nightmare to undo what misery somebody else had caused.
So this is #1 in our continuing saga of string height.
#2... is the truss rod adjusted properly so as to maintain fret clearance to the 12th fret?
This then, gets us back to the slight 'dip' that you should see in your neck, while looking down the fretboard from the headstock. Again, this is very important in maintaining proper action on your guitar. If you are unsure of what it should be, and you don't really feel comfortable adjusting a truss rod, then bring it to someone you know and trust with your instrument. Back to the place you bought it is usually the right thing to do.
When the strings are removed from your guitar and the neck is at 'rest', you should be able to place a straight-edge on the fret board, and it should be completely level, or very close to that. If not, you have a problem. You never want to see a crown on your fretboard, as this could be a result of over tightening the truss rod.
I have had people come to me and told me they tried to adjust their truss rod, and 'nothing happened'. Well, something 'happened' alright. What usually happens in a case like this, is the truss rod was broken as a result of over-tightening.
The other thing that over tightening of the truss rod can cause is 'twisting' of the neck. When this happens, if left for too long, it is almost impossible to restore the instrument, at least without some major surgery. And that can become very costly.
#3...So, what else can cause problems with string height?
Here are a few:
New neck, neck components. Neck reset on an acoustic guitar. New frets. Fingerboard re-levelled.
New bridge components, saddles, pickups installed below the saddles on an acoustic guitar. A new bridge on your electric guitar that you thought should be a retro-fit because it came right from Gibson. 'Not!!'
I have been working on guitars for close to 50 years now. Seldom do I put any creedence in the terms "cross reference", "OEM", "Original Vintage Replacement"or "retro-fit". No two guitars are built alike, not even on the same day, and seldom are the components. So any of these items can be a problem for maintaining proper string height.
#4 Here is probably the simplest cause of improper string height.....did you just change, or have your strings changed by that professional fella down the street?
Did he install the right gauge set for the guitar?
I remember being in a store locally not so long ago. A gentleman came in and asked for a set of strings for his Ovation acoustic. The store owner, who should have known better, sold him a set of medium / heavy gauge strings. I caught the fellow on the way out and told him to go back and ask for a set of lights, or light mediums for his guitar. Reason being the heavier strings would drastically have changed his string height, as well as lifting the bridge right off of his lovely little Ovation due to the increase in tension.
So the right strings are always important on an electric and an acoustic guitar, and yes...even on a Bass. Longer scale basses like the Fender Jazz and Precision, require a longer scale set. They are usually a dollar or two more, but get the right strings for your bass. That is important.
Most modern bass guitars utilize a 'dual action' truss rod. This is like two rods in one. These are used on instruments with wider and thicker fretboards and are well known to bass players because of the longer scale of the instrument. They work quite similar to single action truss rods, but require very little adjustment comparatively to the others.
So keep all of these things in mind whenever you are setting the 'action' on your guitar.
An old fellow at one of the places I used to frequent when I was a kid once told me.....the action on your guitar should be as close to the frets as you can get it without a rattle or a buzz. If you get a rattle or a buzz, raise the bridge! Wise words! And really, that is the way it is.
We all have different tastes, feels and sounds. But really, string height should be what you want, and what you feel is right. There are things to watch out for with super-low action, but that will be another story. Rock on!!
Brett McNaueal
String height is also referred to as 'action' on a guitar.
The answer to this is....'it depends!!'
An optimum string height for an acoustic guitar should be about 1/8" at the 12th fret. For an electric, about 3/32" at the 12th fret.
Proper string height depends on a lot of things, and this is the way I look at it.
The first thing you want to check is, has there been any work done to the instrument recently, frets repaired, levelled or dressed and polished. Believe it or not, this can make a huge difference in the performance and action on your instrument.
I have had guitars come to me, both electric and acoustic that have had a few frets replaced. These are usually the first three or four frets closest to the nut. I have seen some major league 'hack jobs' where the fret wire is not even close to then original size. As a result, the string height had to be raised so the strings would clear the new frets. This made the instrument virtually unplayable, and was usually a nightmare to undo what misery somebody else had caused.
So this is #1 in our continuing saga of string height.
#2... is the truss rod adjusted properly so as to maintain fret clearance to the 12th fret?
This then, gets us back to the slight 'dip' that you should see in your neck, while looking down the fretboard from the headstock. Again, this is very important in maintaining proper action on your guitar. If you are unsure of what it should be, and you don't really feel comfortable adjusting a truss rod, then bring it to someone you know and trust with your instrument. Back to the place you bought it is usually the right thing to do.
When the strings are removed from your guitar and the neck is at 'rest', you should be able to place a straight-edge on the fret board, and it should be completely level, or very close to that. If not, you have a problem. You never want to see a crown on your fretboard, as this could be a result of over tightening the truss rod.
I have had people come to me and told me they tried to adjust their truss rod, and 'nothing happened'. Well, something 'happened' alright. What usually happens in a case like this, is the truss rod was broken as a result of over-tightening.
The other thing that over tightening of the truss rod can cause is 'twisting' of the neck. When this happens, if left for too long, it is almost impossible to restore the instrument, at least without some major surgery. And that can become very costly.
#3...So, what else can cause problems with string height?
Here are a few:
New neck, neck components. Neck reset on an acoustic guitar. New frets. Fingerboard re-levelled.
New bridge components, saddles, pickups installed below the saddles on an acoustic guitar. A new bridge on your electric guitar that you thought should be a retro-fit because it came right from Gibson. 'Not!!'
I have been working on guitars for close to 50 years now. Seldom do I put any creedence in the terms "cross reference", "OEM", "Original Vintage Replacement"or "retro-fit". No two guitars are built alike, not even on the same day, and seldom are the components. So any of these items can be a problem for maintaining proper string height.
#4 Here is probably the simplest cause of improper string height.....did you just change, or have your strings changed by that professional fella down the street?
Did he install the right gauge set for the guitar?
I remember being in a store locally not so long ago. A gentleman came in and asked for a set of strings for his Ovation acoustic. The store owner, who should have known better, sold him a set of medium / heavy gauge strings. I caught the fellow on the way out and told him to go back and ask for a set of lights, or light mediums for his guitar. Reason being the heavier strings would drastically have changed his string height, as well as lifting the bridge right off of his lovely little Ovation due to the increase in tension.
So the right strings are always important on an electric and an acoustic guitar, and yes...even on a Bass. Longer scale basses like the Fender Jazz and Precision, require a longer scale set. They are usually a dollar or two more, but get the right strings for your bass. That is important.
Most modern bass guitars utilize a 'dual action' truss rod. This is like two rods in one. These are used on instruments with wider and thicker fretboards and are well known to bass players because of the longer scale of the instrument. They work quite similar to single action truss rods, but require very little adjustment comparatively to the others.
So keep all of these things in mind whenever you are setting the 'action' on your guitar.
An old fellow at one of the places I used to frequent when I was a kid once told me.....the action on your guitar should be as close to the frets as you can get it without a rattle or a buzz. If you get a rattle or a buzz, raise the bridge! Wise words! And really, that is the way it is.
We all have different tastes, feels and sounds. But really, string height should be what you want, and what you feel is right. There are things to watch out for with super-low action, but that will be another story. Rock on!!
Brett McNaueal
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Truss Rod Adjustments
This can be a complex issue, but really
doesn't have to be. The most important thing to remember is that you
want to see a slight relief in the neck. That is looking down the
headstock toward the 12th fret. You want to see a slight 'dip' in the
neck between the 4th and the 9th frets. This maintains fret clearance
to the 12th fret. After that the bridge takes over and maintains
clearance up scale. How much relief? Depends on the type of the
guitar, the wood the neck and fretboard is made from, string gauge,
and a whole lot of other things. Acoustics are different from
electrics and require slightly more relief to allow for string
clearance on the first three frets.
When storing guitars, it's always a
good idea to back off the string tension a couple of tones to allow
the truss rod to rest. Adjustments to the truss rod should only be
made when they are really necessary. (i.e. fret buzz, resetting
action, or intonation problems)
Hope this helps.
Cheers!
Brett
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Storing Your Guitar
It is always a good idea to back off the string tension on guitars that are going to be stored. This allows the truss rod to rest, and you can rest assured the guitar will perform properly when you decide to tune it back up and use it again.
If the bridge is lifting on a guitar, especially a twelve string, that is usually the cause. Always a good idea to tune a 12 string down a full tone and use a capo for performance. You will find the guitar easier to play, your strings will last longer and sound better as well. And don't let anyone sell you medium gauge strings for and acoustic. They simply cause too much strain on the body, the soundboard, bracing and the binding. When this stuff comes apart, it's only a matter of time before the bridge plate lets go. There is just nothing left to hold it in place.
Also, humidify these instruments. A solid wood top guitar needs constant humidity. This should run between 38 and 45%. That sounds like a lot, but you have to remember our humidity usually runs at about 50% in the summer and about 30 in the winter. If you have air conditioning at home, be careful with that. Any air conditioner is also a de-humidifier. They all remove humidity from the air before cooling it. It just makes it that much easier to cool. This then means that if you run the air conditioning all summer long, your humidity level should be a concern here.
You mention the Gretsch guitar. I believe that one is the Electromatic. I really wouldn't worry too much about this guitar. As I mentioned prior, loosen the strings and relax the truss rod. By doing so you are also taking undue tension off of the soundboard. Archtops should be treated a little different than the others. They are a little more delicate. Still, the Gretsch is a laminated maple top, and that is tough stuff.
Hope this helps!
Cheers!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)